Rating of used anti-virus programs by users. Which antivirus is better to install on a PC? Top 5 Review

If you are trying to figure out which antivirus is better, then you have come to the right place!

2) full (paid);

3) extended full (also paid).

The trial version can be installed free of charge on any number of machines.

Resource consumption is individual. But if you take the average, you get something like:

1) Windows XP and above;

Kaspersky

Let's start the "hit parade" with the product of Kaspersky Lab. It copes with the tasks perfectly, is intuitive and has impressive possibilities in terms of settings.

Built-in utilities block the content of suspicious and "adult" content, and also check the reliability of any site visited.

Of the minuses, it is worth noting the overpriced license and the consumption of a huge amount of PC resources and RAM.

If you are doing global check, many background programs will have to be turned off.

Avast!

Many consider Avast to be the best free solution on the market.

It has Sandbox features (login to safe mode, isolated from the general environment) and SafeZone (browsing Internet resources in privacy mode), built-in firewall and anti-spam.

Paid and free versions are practically indistinguishable both in terms of speed and in terms of features. But there are downsides too.

In particular, the product does not block pop-up banners and pop-ups, and it simply skips some malware.

Dr. Web

The famous "green spider" is one of the first products of its kind. He was one of the first to learn how to "treat" infected objects, rather than delete them.

And since viruses often infect executable and system files, this feature plays into the hands of the program.

Also, the user can download the CureIt! proprietary utility completely free of charge, which will work even on an infected PC. The software does not require installation.

Cons are typical for such products:

1) an expensive license, upon renewal of which it is mandatory to provide the old key.

2) ! does not update itself. Need to download new version"from scratch".

NOD32

An excellent product aimed at experienced users and those who like to dig into the settings. Let's not dissemble, the springboard for configuring software "for yourself" is really huge.

It does an excellent job of blocking ads and spam emails, protects Internet ports from attacks, and warns of phishing (fake) sites and spyware.

Often such “software” cannot even be downloaded.

Cons are also present. To begin with, it is impossible to completely remove a product from ESET. Residual files may start to conflict with new antiviruses.

In addition, this program often manages to "restore" itself by downloading the necessary files.

The cost of the license is very high, and the version " smart security' and even more. Yes, and it checks for a long time, not bad loading the processor and memory.

Norton

A reliable antivirus that provides an excellent protection rate with a light load on the PC hardware.

It easily copes with blocking suspicious sites, having a powerful spam filter in its arsenal.

At the same time, the cost of a product license is more modest than that of opponents.

But the most interesting thing is the “parental control” technology, which allows you to create several types of users and restrict children from viewing certain resources.

Among the shortcomings, it is worth noting the complexity of installation on an infected system. In addition, full-featured "control" must be purchased separately.

At the same time, the antivirus does not lend itself to some test programs, so it is a moot task to determine the quality of its work objectively.

Important! Before installing an antivirus, think several times what tasks will be assigned to it. Also remember that in the corporate sector, when buying several products, there is a discount on license keys and their further extension. This practice is widely used by ESET and Kaspersky Lab.

If you have already thought about the security of your computer and chose an antivirus program, then you probably read user reviews on the Internet.

Any user would like to install on their computer best antivirus , which provides 100% protection against viruses and other malicious software. That is, the ideal antivirus is the one that installed and forgot about all the dangers forever. The best antivirus should not bother you with various pop-up windows, but should just quietly do its job, protecting your computer 100% from viruses and other evil spirits.

I hasten to disappoint everyone who wants to find the best antivirus. " The best antivirus does not exist and cannot exist. There is a completely logical explanation for this, but I would not like to delve into all the technical points. In the following, I will only cover the most important things that every computer user should understand.

The proof that the best antivirus does not exist can be the comments of the users themselves, which they leave on various forums on the Internet. In these comments, some praise certain antiviruses, while others accuse these programs of being unreliable and leaking viruses and trojans.

Unfortunately, most of these comments are left by people who have a very vague idea about antivirus software and draw conclusions about it only by comparing one antivirus with another.

« Well, yes", you say, " if one antivirus missed the Trojan, and the second one detected it, then the second one is more reliable". But this statement is only half true, or even less!

Have you ever wondered how a virus scan works?

And the search principle is quite simple. Antivirus passes the code of running or downloaded files through itself. Thus, according to certain algorithms, the antivirus searches for suspicious sections of code in the file, and if they are found, they are compared with the information stored in the antivirus database. If the information matches, then the antivirus issues a warning that such and such a virus or malicious software has been detected and even indicates its name taken from the database.

But viruses are created every day and in huge quantities. It's about not about dozens, but about thousands of new computer viruses created daily. Not one anti-virus program simply physically cannot have everything in its anti-virus database. existing viruses and even more so to update the database every day in such a volume. However, this problem has been partially solved.

In order to prevent an unknown virus from entering a computer, antivirus developers create special algorithms that allow them to analyze file codes and isolate potentially dangerous areas. Every modern antivirus is equipped with a so-called heuristic code analyzer. This module uses certain algorithms to analyze files in search of malicious code.

If such a piece of code is found, the antivirus warns about it, indicating the danger in the message. But few people read these messages, right? If a message appears, then for most users this means that a virus has been found! But is it really so?

Each developer of anti-virus software has a heuristic analyzer that works differently. It can be said that this trade secret every developer.

I hope you understand that such an analyzer can just guess that some section of the file's code is malicious. He can't guarantee it 100%.. Therefore, the assertions that some new and as yet unknown antivirus found viruses where everyone knows Kaspersky, Avast or Dr. Web they kept silent, which means that the unknown antivirus is better, it only makes me smile.

It is on the basis of the readings of heuristic analyzers that narrow-minded users conclude that one antivirus is better than another. But let's face it. Unknown anti-virus programs are developed by unknown programmers who, in the field of protection, may have some experience, but not at all comparable to such monsters, for example, as Kaspersky Lab or ESET NOD32, who have been professionally dealing with protection problems for decades.

Very often, the developers of new antiviruses "reinsure themselves", as a result of which their brainchildren block any files whose code they "did not like" for some reason.

Even well-known manufacturers in their heuristic code analyzers sometimes use algorithms that block quite reliable files.

Here is an example from my personal experience. In the early 2000s, I used free antivirus Avira. This is an antivirus from a German company that is one of the oldest antivirus developers and to this day their products are among the best in their class. At that time, another service pack was released, that is, an update for operating system Windows 2000 and I downloaded it from the official Microsoft website, but Avira blocked this update, accusing it of a trojan...

Of course, there are people who, on the basis of this case, will conclude that Microsoft is distributing Trojans in order to take over all the computers in the world :) There have always been and always will be lovers of the “great conspiracy” theory. But let's face it - the heuristic analyzer of this antivirus has failed. Neither Kaspersky, nor Dr. Web, nor NOD32 found no threat...

Therefore, it is very important to understand that the heuristic analyzer only assumes the presence of a virus that is not listed in anti-virus databases. This assumption is based on special algorithms for some features. The antivirus itself "thinks" that the code being checked is viral.

Besides antivirus often only warns you about the presence of a suspicious file, but users rarely deal with the messages that the antivirus issues, and immediately conclude that the file is infected.

Now let's talk about the reliability of antiviruses.

There are independent laboratories that test antivirus software and issue pivot tables according to test results.

You can find such tests yourself on the Internet, for example, on the website of an independent Russian information and analytical center for information security- anti maLware.ru.

After studying the tests, you will understand that even well-known anti-virus systems make mistakes. They miss viruses and trojans, and cannot cure all infected files. Many well-known antiviruses have passed the virus detection test with a very high rate of 99% or so, but there is always 1% that was not detected and it is very important to understand!

So how do you choose the best antivirus?

I hope that you already understand that the best antiviruses simply do not exist!

Remember, the protection that any antivirus program provides is just 10-30% of protecting your entire system!

Therefore, I can give only one piece of advice when choosing anti-virus protection - it should be a product of one of the world's leading developers of anti-virus software.

Which one exactly? This question is very individual and I suggest you study the ratings on your own. antivirus programs, for example, on the website of the independent center for information security anti maLware.ru or any other, and choose an antivirus from the market leaders.

In conclusion, I will only say that I myself used many of the well-known antiviruses - Kaspersky, Avira, sh, Norton Internet Security, NOD 32, but for three years now, as I have been using antivirus protection Avast, both in the free and paid versions.

After installing Windows, you should think about the security of your computer and which antivirus to install, for example, free or paid. The Internet is becoming one of the main areas of human activity. However, many attackers develop programs for easy money making or for the purpose of espionage.

There are a huge number of tricks by which a computer is infected and often the user is not even aware of the threat. Simple caution is no longer enough; mandatory protection by antivirus applications is required. The article discusses which is the most effective antivirus for Windows 7.

It should be noted that there is no absolutely perfect software to install and forget about threats, since one tool can never detect all threats using one method.

Professionals argue that even if you install the most "stuffed" antivirus program on your computer, this will not give a full guarantee of eliminating threats. New malware developments are emerging daily. What is the best antivirus for Windows 7? To answer this question, you first need to find out what viruses are.

Virus software

This computer programs, which can multiply on their own and damage computer data.

List of some species malware:

1. Keyloggers;
2. Trojans;
3. rootkits;
4. Spies.

Antivirus utility

A program that analyzes the system and detects malware, notifies the owner of the computer about the threat, and also performs treatment or removal viral application. The anti-virus utility constantly monitors processes and analyzes the functioning of all programs on the PC. It is recommended to install only one antivirus program on one computer at a time, otherwise they may conflict and as a result the user gets a lot of errors and slow Windows.

A significant number have been developed antivirus utilities which have their pros and cons. For example, some do an excellent job with the presence of viruses in the system, while others do not allow the introduction of threat programs into the computer or have the ability to effectively destroy them.

Conventionally, anti-virus programs are divided into 2 types:

1. free;
2. paid.

They differ not only in price, but also in the effectiveness of protection.

Many will be upset by the fact that qualified programmers say that the best protection for Windows 7 will be provided if you install a paid antivirus. Free software, can also provide basic protection and the best of them are also considered below.

The best paid antiviruses for Windows 7

Kaspersky

It is the most popular of all anti-virus programs in Russia. Professionals make sure it's optimal choice for Windows 7. Thanks to the most powerful algorithms and the largest database of virus content, constantly updated.

What is the main disadvantage of this utility? This is the need to stop applications when the system is fully scanned by antivirus.

The creators of this utility have made paid option not much different from the freely distributed one, so they managed to get a significant number of Avast adherents. But even the paid option often skips malicious utilities.

Dr. Web

One of the most common antivirus among users. The main advantage is the ability to treat individual files. This is a significant advantage over other anti-virus programs, because. allows you to restore the data required by the user. Cons - the high price of a full-fledged version of the program.

This software in the Russian Federation is not very common. Has a Russian interface. Requires complex presetting, so it is only recommended for experienced PC owners. In addition to the basic functions, it provides protection against spam and scammers. Phishing alert. However, users are not happy with the verification process, which takes considerable time and the high price of the product.

The best free antiviruses for Windows 7

360 Total Security and Panda Cloud Antivirus are the best in free antivirus software tests on Windows 7 PCs. Good performance was found in "AVG" and. Not significantly, but the result of the work of "Ad-Aware" is worse. Free Antivirus» . The best for Windows 7 turned out to be free software on the Bitdefender engine.

What is the requirement for system resources?

The best of the free ones turned out to be "360TS" and "Panda Cloud Antivirus". They had a minimal impact on computer hardware due to the use of new cloud technologies using the power of servers for verification.

What is the speed?

With the lowest speed of work: "Ad-Aware Free Antivirus", "Bitdefender Free Edition" and "Comodo" .

The fastest among free ones: "360 Total Security", "Avast" and "AVG".

What is the ease of use?

"Bitdefender Antivirus Free edition" does not offer Russian during installation. Only 360 Total Security boasts a convenient and practical interface.

The article provides an overview of only the most popular utilities. To ensure maximum computer security on Windows 7, it is recommended to follow these tips:

1. when using external storage media, a preliminary scan of their memory for the possibility of malware infection is required;
2. the use of regularly updated anti-virus software is required;
3. not allowed to run unknown apps from unverified sources;
4. while surfing the Internet, there should be constant monitoring of possible threats in real time;

Conclusion

It is absolutely impossible to conclude what is the best software for Windows 7.

What conclusion can be drawn for paid programs?

From paid programs, according to the results of the considered parameters, you can give preference to "Kaspersky" or "Doctor". There are hypotheses on the net that Kaspersky Lab itself develops viruses that are detected only by their program. However, the experience of most users proves the high reliability of this antivirus.

What conclusions can be drawn for free programs?

For active Internet users, it is best to choose the free "360 Total Security". And in case of good ownership English language it is recommended to install the free version of Bitdefender.

The Windows operating system, unlike GNU/Linux, cannot fully protect against malware by its own capabilities. No matter how the developers praised Windows Defender, it is far from perfect, so you have to use external software. This article discusses the rating of antiviruses 2019.

Which antivirus to choose

Each antivirus product offers users, in addition to virus detection and elimination, a set of additional features. Usually, they are related to advanced PC management, network security, Wi-Fi protection, etc. The most important criteria for choosing an antivirus include:

• cloud analysis. Ability to scan files in an isolated environment;
• firewall. Blocking unwanted Internet resources;
• protection of personal information. First of all, these are bank data and some other personal information.

If any of these items is missing in the antivirus, this does not mean that it is bad. The effectiveness of a program is revealed in practice when it performs its main function well. The rest depends on the additional needs of the user.

Antivirus rating 2019

Exists a large number of Software that offers its services to combat viruses and trojans. Each of them has its pros and cons. Depending on the needs and possibilities, it is worth making a choice on the most suitable product.

Short review

Consider each of the antiviruses presented in the table, comparing their advantages and disadvantages.

In addition to the standard security feature, the antivirus offers a built-in security gateway when connected to open networks Wi-Fi and special password storage to save personal data in the cloud. There is also a game mode that disables program notifications and reduces the load on the processor during a game session.

Advantages

• WiFi protection;
• the presence of a game mode;
• password container.

Flaws

• no firewall;
• lack of protection against interception of input data.

Free version well-known anti-virus software, created specifically for users of post-Soviet countries. The program provides online protection and has the necessary functionality to ensure the security of the PC from the introduction of malicious code.

Advantages

• powerful core;
• verification of attachments in messengers;
• built-in VPN service.

Flaws

• lack of protection against interception of bank data;
• high consumption of PC resources.

Product of Chinese manufacturers. Became widely known in the Russian-speaking segment due to the binding capabilities of anti-virus software and optimizer. It has multiple engines. A key factor in its distribution and popularity is a large amount of advertising.

Advantages

• wide functionality;
• there is a firewall;
• several anti-virus engines are running;
• optimized consumption of computer resources.

Antivirus in a minimalistic style. It has a small number of settings and a simple menu. TO additional features The program should only include the ability to force scan a specific folder. Suitable for those new to computer use.

Advantages

• simple settings;
• a convincing indicator of virus detection.

Flaws

• limited functionality;
• lack of Russian localization.

The first product with a free license that implements a cloud analysis algorithm. When scanning files in an isolated container, the collective scanning method is enabled, which means that the scan results of other users are taken into account.

Advantages

• effective collective verification algorithm;
• minimum number of notifications;
• pre-analysis of flash drives.

Flaws

• little functionality;
• dependence on an internet connection to work effectively.

Unusual antivirus software that shows the greatest efficiency when connected to the Internet. For scanning, the offline ClamAV core is used, in parallel with which suspicious objects are analyzed by twelve VirusTotal engines. SecureAPlus works easily on a PC with other security software.

Advantages

• highly efficient cloud scanning;
• software analysis based on a trusted list;
• works in parallel with other antivirus.

Flaws

• the proactive core is not powerful enough;
• lack of protection of personal data.

Very effective free tool. There is the possibility of protecting personal data, a built-in firewall and even a task scheduler. It is distinguished by a high degree of efficiency of cloud analysis.

Advantages

• convenient functionality;
• availability of plug-ins for protecting data in browser forms;
• built-in firewall and task scheduler.

This is not a full-fledged applied antivirus, but a curing utility that works offline. Contains the latest virus database at the time of download. The program is recommended for spot check computer and does not protect in real time. The name of the utility is generated from letters and numbers with each download so that the virus cannot block its work by using a static name.

It goes without saying that in our computerized age, protecting information or entire systems from is essential. In other words, any computer, in addition to the built-in tools of the system itself, must have at least some more or less functional antivirus. Let's try to consider the lightest antiviruses and, based on the test results, we will determine what is best suited for protection today.

Safety first!

As for antivirus software, now you can find not dozens, but hundreds of options. Of course, it will not be possible to consider all of them, especially since in terms of functionality they are completely unequal among themselves.

Therefore, we will focus on several of the most famous software products. Perhaps the comparative results will tell someone which is the easiest antivirus for XP or server Windows versions. Let's make a reservation right away that the same “explosion”, although it still remains a very popular and in-demand system, is nevertheless hopelessly outdated. However, a solution will be offered for it.

The lightest antiviruses: the main aspects of testing

Of course, not every person who constantly works with a computer can afford to purchase the most modern configuration with a powerful multi-core processor chip, large volume random access memory, a modern video card, etc. Therefore, let's see what tests show for the lightest antivirus for a computer with an average configuration. Let's take 4.1 GB of RAM and an 80-gigabyte hard drive as a basis. It seems to be just right for testing.

As for the main tests, consider the performance of several independent laboratories. Among the checks, we highlight the following:

• parallel work with resource-intensive applications;
• threats from unsafe sites;
• speed of copying or moving data on the hard disk;
• work in the background.

Kaspersky Internet Security

So, we have one of the most famous anti-virus packages of our time. Many may object. Why was it necessary to include a Kaspersky Lab software product in the list? The fact is that, unlike all other anti-virus packages, this program is the least demanding on system resources.

The results of testing on the above configuration, although not ideal, look quite encouraging. This primarily concerns the identification of potential threats when browsing the Internet or when installing any software. However, along with this, there are clearly expressed disadvantages. So, for example, the boot time of the system itself increases significantly, after it starts, it takes a long time to connect via a Wi-Fi connection, when downloading files using the same torrent client, the time to save to disk is quite long. This is due to checking content in real time. By the way, Kaspersky is the only package for which this time goes off scale.

When accessing the hard disk (copying files), there is a clear slowdown in work. Not critical, but still there. And when you start the Photoshop package, in general, the system starts to slow down in earnest (the antivirus itself consumes too much RAM). So to say that this is the lightest antivirus for a laptop or a stationary terminal, the language does not turn. In principle, it can be used if you do not work with heavy applications in parallel. But in terms of protection, it is in the lead, even despite the increased load on system resources.

ESET Smart Security

Another major player in the antivirus software market is the Smart Security package from ESET. On this moment the eighth version of the program is available.

In principle, the behavior of this application is somewhat reminiscent of Kaspersky. System boot time has been increased, in addition, initial check automatically loading components lasts quite a long time (this is especially noticeable in Windows XP). The overall defense showed good results even when the Anti-Theft function is disabled. When accessing the hard drive, there are no delays, there are no problems with the speed of access to the Internet either, however, at startup skype download application runs for a long time. However, if you look at the resource usage monitor, you will notice that the load is not as great as it might seem at first. It reaches its maximum peaks only at the time of updating the anti-virus databases and the initial scan. It can and should also be used, but it cannot be called the fastest, although compared to Kaspersky it is heaven and earth.

Dr. Web Security Space

Now about one more well-known package, which is rightfully considered one of the best means of protecting computer systems.

What do its results show? Firstly, during installation, the program offers to install your own firewall, which you do not need to do in any case, since conflicts with the native Windows firewall may occur and a significant increase in the load on the system. Booting the system is quite fast (according to the report, about 60-65 seconds), but in reality it takes much more time before the hard disk access stops completely. Parallel to Photoshop work almost impossible wifi network when connected, he thinks a little longer than usual, but in everything else - the indicators are quite high.

Now fly in the ointment. As it turned out, the program sometimes spontaneously activates something like a hidden full check. In this case, the load on the central processor can increase by 50%. However, this only occurs when using default settings default. If you disable all unnecessary, you can get high-quality protection.

Avira Antivirus Pro

Avira makes a good enough impression. In principle, in terms of its performance, the antivirus is somewhere in the middle of the list. Its only problem is running resource-intensive applications. With Photoshop, this is not expressed too strongly, but some guest (child) operating systems refuse to work (at least when they are first launched).

In general, it cannot be said that this is the easiest, nevertheless, in terms of quality reliable protection can be used (especially on weak machines, hardly anyone will put virtual machine). If you characterize it briefly, a good solid middle peasant.

Avast Internet Security

Regarding this software product, in almost all indicators, he scored true, some errors were noticed in identifying potential threats.

But at start Photoshop or accessing the hard drive, monitoring the load on the system showed an unprecedented result. For example, the consumption of RAM in active mode is only 80-100 MB! The only negative is the excessive talkativeness of the program. Yes Yes! It is talkativeness, since the voice notification mode is enabled in the default settings. However, turning it off is not difficult.

Microsoft Security Essentials

Finally, the native brainchild of Microsoft Corporation. As testing shows, it must also be included in the list of "The lightest antiviruses". Since Windows systems are still the most common in our country, it suits them almost perfectly, because who, if not the creators of this family of operating systems themselves, knows what kind of security holes they have. In addition, when using this package, the appearance of conflicts in the firewall is excluded.

For all other indicators, the result can be called satisfactory, except for the excessive load on the system when accessing the hard drive. Sometimes when installing third party programs false positives may appear, as some of them try to make necessary changes to system files.

What is the lightest antivirus?

What do the test results say, in which the lightest antiviruses were presented? Avast shows the best overall performance. First of all, this is a practically absent load on the system, even when working with heavy programs. The protection system, of course, is not ideal, but for weak machines or configurations on Windows based XP, I think it is ideal. Moreover, if we do not take into account technical aspects, we can say that Avast is the easiest free antivirus. But most programs need to either be bought or permanently activated when using even shareware versions.

On the other hand, today there is not a single program that would meet high security requirements, and, moreover, would not load the system. And, of course, other well-known antiviruses like Bitdefender and based on it were not considered here, due to the fact that the antivirus itself is too voracious, and its modifications like 360 ​​Security, although they work quite quickly, do not provide the proper level of protection, and even often give false alarms. However, what exactly to use is already a purely personal matter.